Mais um gol contra no time de Darwin
It was completely unexpected," he says. "We sat there banging our heads against the wall. Darwin’s hypothesis has been with us for so long, how can it not be right?"
A hipótese que organismos mais próximos ,de acordo com a árvore da evolução, competiriam mais entre si não funcionou para algas verdes.
Para mais detalhes, veja data-dont-back-up-darwin-in-algae-study.
The religion is stronger than the science. Can you imagine how far mankind would have come had more respect been shown the natural world and it's clearly organized complexity as opposed to the unguided purposeless bundle of mistakes which just made stuff happen ? I'm amazed of how this Darwin who invented his philosophy motivated by his anger against God, is looked upon by his present day followers as a Mystic Holy Man of sorts. Incredibly, many of his defenders will promote claims far beyond his actual writings. When called on the carpet for their religious speculations, they claim the ability of a spiritualist to almost channel the dead man and who somehow explains what he really meant, even though his writings reveal no where close to whatever is being discussed or debated. Mostly, it's never about science as it is about religious philosophy and ideologically driven politics for worldview control over others.
ResponderExcluirHad more respect been given nature for it's intelligent complexity, it is clearly many irresponsible technologies wouldn't have been pursued. The present climate change for example is the result of the misuse and abuse of science based on this bitter old man's beef with God. So I find it humorous when newer scientific findings reveal how wrong the man actually was and the crazy faith shaking reactions of his religious faithful followers who become disillusioned and stumbled by results which reveal the real truth.